Comments on: Linux kernel: Uhhuh. NMI received for unknown reason 30 http://www.cyberciti.biz/faq/linux-kernel-uhhuh-nmi-received-for-unknown-reason-30/ Every answer asks a more beautiful question. Fri, 10 Feb 2012 19:55:56 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: bob dobbshttp://www.cyberciti.biz/faq/linux-kernel-uhhuh-nmi-received-for-unknown-reason-30/#comment-66472 bob dobbs Fri, 06 Jan 2012 22:34:58 +0000 http://www.cyberciti.biz/faq/?p=3079#comment-66472 So, you recommend turning off the nmi_watchdog, that listens for hardware throwing errors that may compromise your system? Probably not smart. Just out of curiosity why would you additionally suggest changing the kernel timer as a method to avoid a hardware device throwing kill signals? BTW, this is not caused by the system hanging under load. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-maskable_interrupt even wikipedia knows better So, you recommend turning off the nmi_watchdog, that listens for hardware throwing errors that may compromise your system? Probably not smart. Just out of curiosity why would you additionally suggest changing the kernel timer as a method to avoid a hardware device throwing kill signals? BTW, this is not caused by the system hanging under load.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-maskable_interrupt

even wikipedia knows better

]]> By: MiGhttp://www.cyberciti.biz/faq/linux-kernel-uhhuh-nmi-received-for-unknown-reason-30/#comment-65042 MiG Thu, 01 Dec 2011 14:35:18 +0000 http://www.cyberciti.biz/faq/?p=3079#comment-65042 try also the "acpi=off" switch because on some cause it works better than the two ones proposed in this article try also the “acpi=off” switch because on some cause it works better than the two ones proposed in this article

]]>