<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Can RAID Act As The Reliable BACKUP Solution For Linux / UNIX / Windows Server?</title> <atom:link href="http://www.cyberciti.biz/faq/linux-unix-windows-raid-only-backup-solution/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.cyberciti.biz/faq/linux-unix-windows-raid-only-backup-solution/</link> <description>Every answer asks a more beautiful question.</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 19:55:56 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Jason Walker</title><link>http://www.cyberciti.biz/faq/linux-unix-windows-raid-only-backup-solution/#comment-38027</link> <dc:creator>Jason Walker</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 23:39:08 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.cyberciti.biz/faq/?p=1059#comment-38027</guid> <description>Great points in the article/response. To further some of the thoughts....
The backup concept should be considered as a method to restore data to secondary computing devices or to restore the data based on the fault of a device or user error.
RAID 5 is graceful for tolerance against a single point of failure (the article/response covers this) and allows admins to recover a system when a single drive requires replacement. This should mean hot-swappable drives - power and data connections.
In the event the DATA CENTER is compromised, RAID don&#039;t mean a thing if you can&#039;t take it with you. The article/response starts down this path of &quot;moving data off site&quot;. There will be times when off site is the only option.
Also, a RAID device is not going to allow an admin to recover files deleted by a user.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great points in the article/response. To further some of the thoughts&#8230;.</p><p>The backup concept should be considered as a method to restore data to secondary computing devices or to restore the data based on the fault of a device or user error.</p><p>RAID 5 is graceful for tolerance against a single point of failure (the article/response covers this) and allows admins to recover a system when a single drive requires replacement. This should mean hot-swappable drives &#8211; power and data connections.</p><p>In the event the DATA CENTER is compromised, RAID don&#8217;t mean a thing if you can&#8217;t take it with you. The article/response starts down this path of &#8220;moving data off site&#8221;. There will be times when off site is the only option.</p><p>Also, a RAID device is not going to allow an admin to recover files deleted by a user.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
