Comments on: Ubuntu Linux: Legal Codecs and DVD Playback For All Users

By: Joe

Joe — Mon, 18 Jul 2011 23:44:17 +0000

The MPAA looks at it this way:
You are not buying the product. You are buying permission to view the product with severe pre-set limitations, which are determined and subject to change by the owner at any time for any reason with no notice or notification whatsoever. 1. You do not own the product. 2. The owner of the product has the right to demand return of the product, for any reason, at any time, with or without refund (more likely without). 3. You may not use the product other than the manner in which the owner deemed fit. 4. You may not redistribute, share, loan, or in any way allow any other person to use the product, even if they have already purchased the product in question. 5. The product may not be resold to another party at any time other than by the owner.
FYI…. you are not the owner… the record label or producer of the film is the owner.

By: vishalbandre

vishalbandre — Mon, 21 Mar 2011 05:02:00 +0000

Where is codecs download link , other information was helpful for me @

By: Patrick

Patrick — Tue, 06 Apr 2010 04:26:15 +0000

i noticed there is not much competition for linux dvd player software, yet there are many countries that have many linux users. Most countries are allowed to play movies using open source software which is claimed to give enough room for copying movies. If there were free closed source dvd players for linux than recording industries may be able to push more countries into stopping distribution of software that readily plays any region without any restrictions. If enough countries got involved with this, there wound be less of a need for regions and potentially more money for them if the idea of open source software is such a bad thing. Otherwise it seems like there is more of a potential that the MPAA is only about using lawyers to annoy and discourage customers from buying their products instead of trying to create solutions that might actually be more appealing to their customers. What is the point in watching the movies of the companies that seem more geared towards making their customers hate them? Im sure this is not their intention, but that is what results from a long list of issues that seem geared only towards punishing their source of money.

By: monteyfisk

monteyfisk — Sat, 26 Sep 2009 12:47:22 +0000

Do you work for the MPAA Chris? The MPAA already got paid when I purchased the DVD, the DVD-ROM drive, the laptop that came preinstalled with Windows and Cyberlink PowerDVD software. Tell me EXACTLY how anyone (who is not an idiot) could possibly see it as “stealing. cut-and-dried” if I don’t pay them yet again if I want to watch my DVD on a second partition where I have installed Linux on the same laptop.

By: chris

chris — Tue, 07 Jul 2009 02:47:15 +0000

Please don’t forget, folks, that using “restricted” codecs w/o paying a royalty is stealing. cut-and-dried!

By: Ali Ross

Ali Ross — Wed, 24 Sep 2008 20:11:21 +0000

Ahh, this article did not make that major rather fact apparent.

In this case, I don’t see this as a major advance by Canonical at all, in fact almost the opposite. It’s just another way to generate revenue. The fact that you still have to download it post-install is no better either. The article made it sound like the next version of Ubuntu was coming with DVD and MP3 support, and Canonical were footing the bill somehow. If you have to use your brain, go to the ubuntu shop and buy it, then download and install it, then I can’t see how that’s going to bring new users to Linux. It’s still an un-necessary un-user friendly hassle. The more experienced Linux users won’t care about this, but for the new users which Ubuntu caters for so well, this is not good.

I do hope that they will continue to provide DVD/MP3 support via their restricted repositories also, as I certainly won’t be paying this amount of cash for something I can get for free in Windows – even although I’m kinda paying for it with Microsoft’s EULA.

By: leamanc

leamanc — Wed, 24 Sep 2008 05:57:19 +0000

Ali Ross,

If you click through the link,you will see that these codecs are being sold through Ubuntu’s store for £ 12.28 (MP3/Windows Media) or £ 19.66 for “Complete Playback” (same as the other one plus other codecs and DVD playback.

Legal issues aside though, I would still prefer to use Ubuntu’s existing “restricted” multimedia codecs. Ubuntu covers itself legally by not including them with the distro, forcing end users enable the repositories where they exist.

By: Stephen

Stephen — Tue, 23 Sep 2008 23:30:00 +0000

$40 USD seems like a lot of money to license a few codecs. I think it’s a good idea to give people he option, but the price is far too high.

By: Ali Ross

Ali Ross — Mon, 22 Sep 2008 11:10:08 +0000

Yes, this *is* great. I can see a lot of newbie users breathing a great sigh of relief over this, as to newcomers to Linux often there is a notion that Linux is ‘inferior’ because ‘it doesn’t support MP3/DVD out of the box’. Great to dispel this untruth.

However, this article doesn’t state how Canonical/Fluendo/Cyberlink got round this issue. Does this mean that Canonical are now paying the royalties for the necessary codecs? If so, that’s generous, but how long can they manage to finance such a deal?

-Al

By: ciacob

ciacob — Sat, 20 Sep 2008 10:07:42 +0000

…Which is just great :)