<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Linux Creating a Partition Size Larger Than 2TB</title> <atom:link href="http://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/fdisk-unable-to-create-partition-greater-2tb.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/fdisk-unable-to-create-partition-greater-2tb.html</link> <description>This is a Linux sys admin journal by Vivek about sys admin work, Linux tips &#38; tricks, hacks, news and more.</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 20:37:43 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Ezequiel</title><link>http://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/fdisk-unable-to-create-partition-greater-2tb.html#comment-178997</link> <dc:creator>Ezequiel</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 20:16:34 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/fdisk-unable-to-create-partition-greater-2tb.html#comment-178997</guid> <description>Every time i need some tech advise i go to google to find information, every other site is kind of scrambled, no clear information, until i find this page.
NOTHING needs to be explained.....everything clear as water.
Thank you so much guys, keep up the GREAT work</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Every time i need some tech advise i go to google to find information, every other site is kind of scrambled, no clear information, until i find this page.</p><p>NOTHING needs to be explained&#8230;..everything clear as water.<br
/> Thank you so much guys, keep up the GREAT work</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Stefan Lasiewski</title><link>http://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/fdisk-unable-to-create-partition-greater-2tb.html#comment-178003</link> <dc:creator>Stefan Lasiewski</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 21:59:12 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/fdisk-unable-to-create-partition-greater-2tb.html#comment-178003</guid> <description>Now the other question, how long will it take to fsck one of these 3TB filesystem? This could take many hours. We&#039;ve seen it take over 12 hours for a large filesystem.
By default the OS will automatically fsck the filesystem &quot;every 25 mounts or 180 days, whichever comes first&quot;. This could be a serious issue if you want to reboot the system 180 days from now, as your 4 minute reboot could turn into a 4+ hour wait for fsck to complete.
If you want to disable the automatic fsck upon boot, try this command:
&lt;pre&gt;
# tune2fs -c 0 /dev/sdb1
tune2fs 1.41.12 (17-May-2010)
Setting maximal mount count to -1
&lt;/pre&gt;
`tune2fs -i 0 /dev/sdb1` will also disable the automatic fsck.
-= Stefan</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now the other question, how long will it take to fsck one of these 3TB filesystem? This could take many hours. We&#8217;ve seen it take over 12 hours for a large filesystem.</p><p>By default the OS will automatically fsck the filesystem &#8220;every 25 mounts or 180 days, whichever comes first&#8221;. This could be a serious issue if you want to reboot the system 180 days from now, as your 4 minute reboot could turn into a 4+ hour wait for fsck to complete.</p><p>If you want to disable the automatic fsck upon boot, try this command:</p><pre>
# tune2fs -c 0 /dev/sdb1
tune2fs 1.41.12 (17-May-2010)
Setting maximal mount count to -1
</pre><p>`tune2fs -i 0 /dev/sdb1` will also disable the automatic fsck.</p><p>-= Stefan</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: DMC</title><link>http://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/fdisk-unable-to-create-partition-greater-2tb.html#comment-175579</link> <dc:creator>DMC</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2011 16:22:18 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/fdisk-unable-to-create-partition-greater-2tb.html#comment-175579</guid> <description>&gt;Gadgetman October 16, 2008
&gt;I could create on 3TB volume following guide above. But when rebooting, the pratition tabled is wrong. Pleas Help /T
I&#039;ve just found the cause of this problem.
http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/showthread.php?p=4519659#post4519659
Maybe reply #9 explains the reason.
Could anyone tell me whether this issue has already resolved or not.
DMC</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;Gadgetman October 16, 2008<br
/> &gt;I could create on 3TB volume following guide above. But when rebooting, the pratition tabled is wrong. Pleas Help /T</p><p>I&#8217;ve just found the cause of this problem.<br
/> <a
href="http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/showthread.php?p=4519659#post4519659" rel="nofollow">http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/showthread.php?p=4519659#post4519659</a><br
/> Maybe reply #9 explains the reason.<br
/> Could anyone tell me whether this issue has already resolved or not.</p><p>DMC</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Sean</title><link>http://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/fdisk-unable-to-create-partition-greater-2tb.html#comment-174875</link> <dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2011 21:55:34 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/fdisk-unable-to-create-partition-greater-2tb.html#comment-174875</guid> <description>Hi Nick,
Thanks for the reply. While in Parted, I still can&#039;t get anywhere because the disk&#039;s label remains unrecognized, and the mklabel command simply returns the above-mentioned error (pretty much every command in Parted returns the same error: &quot;unrecognised disk label&quot;). Should I be using a different Linux tool to look at the drive?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Nick,</p><p>Thanks for the reply. While in Parted, I still can&#8217;t get anywhere because the disk&#8217;s label remains unrecognized, and the mklabel command simply returns the above-mentioned error (pretty much every command in Parted returns the same error: &#8220;unrecognised disk label&#8221;). Should I be using a different Linux tool to look at the drive?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Nick</title><link>http://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/fdisk-unable-to-create-partition-greater-2tb.html#comment-174869</link> <dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2011 17:33:50 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/fdisk-unable-to-create-partition-greater-2tb.html#comment-174869</guid> <description>Sean,
I seem to have just purchased the same drive you are talking about, and yes I had the same problem. I ended it up there by making an error in following the instructions above. If you look at the  drive, you will notice two partitions on it. Both zero in size. Use rm command for each partition and go carefully back to the beginning.
Note, though, that the above instructions result with some empty space at the beginning of the drive. If you select units as Bytes, the empty space will be moved to the end of the drive.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sean,</p><p>I seem to have just purchased the same drive you are talking about, and yes I had the same problem. I ended it up there by making an error in following the instructions above. If you look at the  drive, you will notice two partitions on it. Both zero in size. Use rm command for each partition and go carefully back to the beginning.<br
/> Note, though, that the above instructions result with some empty space at the beginning of the drive. If you select units as Bytes, the empty space will be moved to the end of the drive.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Sean</title><link>http://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/fdisk-unable-to-create-partition-greater-2tb.html#comment-174725</link> <dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 09 Oct 2011 23:49:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/fdisk-unable-to-create-partition-greater-2tb.html#comment-174725</guid> <description>I&#039;m getting the same errors from Parted as mentioned by Chris above...
&quot;&lt;em&gt;Warning: Device /dev/sdd has a logical sector size of 4096.&lt;/em&gt;&quot; and &quot;&lt;em&gt;Error: Invalid argument during write on /dev/sdd  Retry/Ignore/Cancel?&lt;/em&gt;&quot; At which point only Cancel does anything.
In my case the drive is a Hitachi XL3000 3TB (external USB 2.0) and I wanted to format it ext3. Since Parted didn&#039;t work for me, I partitioned it under OS X (Disk Utility) as a single 3TB partition. And then mkfs.ext3 and tune2fs -L for the label. Seems to be working now, but if someone smarter than me wanted to explain how to do it without resorting to OS X, that would be awesome.
Any help?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m getting the same errors from Parted as mentioned by Chris above&#8230;<br
/> &#8220;<em>Warning: Device /dev/sdd has a logical sector size of 4096.</em>&#8221; and &#8220;<em>Error: Invalid argument during write on /dev/sdd  Retry/Ignore/Cancel?</em>&#8221; At which point only Cancel does anything.</p><p>In my case the drive is a Hitachi XL3000 3TB (external USB 2.0) and I wanted to format it ext3. Since Parted didn&#8217;t work for me, I partitioned it under OS X (Disk Utility) as a single 3TB partition. And then mkfs.ext3 and tune2fs -L for the label. Seems to be working now, but if someone smarter than me wanted to explain how to do it without resorting to OS X, that would be awesome.</p><p>Any help?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Vivek Gite</title><link>http://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/fdisk-unable-to-create-partition-greater-2tb.html#comment-174128</link> <dc:creator>Vivek Gite</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2011 12:13:09 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/fdisk-unable-to-create-partition-greater-2tb.html#comment-174128</guid> <description>@All,
I&#039;ve updated the tutorial with step by step instructions.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@All,</p><p>I&#8217;ve updated the tutorial with step by step instructions.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Tokynet</title><link>http://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/fdisk-unable-to-create-partition-greater-2tb.html#comment-173860</link> <dc:creator>Tokynet</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 11 Sep 2011 10:04:22 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/fdisk-unable-to-create-partition-greater-2tb.html#comment-173860</guid> <description>When you get ready to format your new huge partition, I recommend using &quot;-m0&quot; with the mkfs command.  This will give you the maximum amount of space to use.
The &#039;-m&#039; sets the reserved block to zero (0).
If you do not add that to the command, you will loose (i think) either 5 or 10% of the drive to reserved blocks.
# mkfs.ext3 -m0 /dev/sda1</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When you get ready to format your new huge partition, I recommend using &#8220;-m0&#8243; with the mkfs command.  This will give you the maximum amount of space to use.<br
/> The &#8216;-m&#8217; sets the reserved block to zero (0).</p><p>If you do not add that to the command, you will loose (i think) either 5 or 10% of the drive to reserved blocks.</p><p># mkfs.ext3 -m0 /dev/sda1</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: KIRAN</title><link>http://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/fdisk-unable-to-create-partition-greater-2tb.html#comment-173843</link> <dc:creator>KIRAN</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 10 Sep 2011 15:09:50 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/fdisk-unable-to-create-partition-greater-2tb.html#comment-173843</guid> <description>how to create a mount point of 20 TB LUN in RHEL 5.4 32 bit?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>how to create a mount point of 20 TB LUN in RHEL 5.4 32 bit?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Sean S</title><link>http://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/fdisk-unable-to-create-partition-greater-2tb.html#comment-173228</link> <dc:creator>Sean S</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 11 Aug 2011 23:46:59 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/fdisk-unable-to-create-partition-greater-2tb.html#comment-173228</guid> <description>I running problem on this. I try to mount a 4*2T RAID5 array with USB connect to NAS IOMEGA IX2-200, the IX2-200 is running Debian Lenny. How could I know if GPT is enabled?
I applied mklabel gpt successfully, but I still see my RAID5 as 2T disk.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I running problem on this. I try to mount a 4*2T RAID5 array with USB connect to NAS IOMEGA IX2-200, the IX2-200 is running Debian Lenny. How could I know if GPT is enabled?</p><p>I applied mklabel gpt successfully, but I still see my RAID5 as 2T disk.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Chad Farmer</title><link>http://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/fdisk-unable-to-create-partition-greater-2tb.html#comment-172567</link> <dc:creator>Chad Farmer</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 21:53:45 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/fdisk-unable-to-create-partition-greater-2tb.html#comment-172567</guid> <description>GPT stands for GUID Partition Table.  This mean that each partition is assigned a unique ID when the partition is created.  So, copying the partition table is a BAD IDEA, even if you know to also copy the backup partition table at the end of the disk.  You should run parted (or whatever) on each disk that needs the &quot;same&quot; partition table and create a new partition table with the same partition types and sizes, but with new (unique) GUID values.
Although not well documented, parted will accept starting location and size in sectors, if values in MB are being rounded and causing slightly different values than desired.  To repartition the fourth disk sdd (and lose all of its content):
parted -s /dev/sdd mkpart   fat16 34s 1048609s
Note that I&#039;m worried about duplicating the GUID that uniquely identifies each partition, not the standardized GUID value that identifies the partition type.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GPT stands for GUID Partition Table.  This mean that each partition is assigned a unique ID when the partition is created.  So, copying the partition table is a BAD IDEA, even if you know to also copy the backup partition table at the end of the disk.  You should run parted (or whatever) on each disk that needs the &#8220;same&#8221; partition table and create a new partition table with the same partition types and sizes, but with new (unique) GUID values.</p><p>Although not well documented, parted will accept starting location and size in sectors, if values in MB are being rounded and causing slightly different values than desired.  To repartition the fourth disk sdd (and lose all of its content):<br
/> parted -s /dev/sdd mkpart   fat16 34s 1048609s</p><p>Note that I&#8217;m worried about duplicating the GUID that uniquely identifies each partition, not the standardized GUID value that identifies the partition type.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Chad Farmer</title><link>http://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/fdisk-unable-to-create-partition-greater-2tb.html#comment-172566</link> <dc:creator>Chad Farmer</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 21:29:40 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/fdisk-unable-to-create-partition-greater-2tb.html#comment-172566</guid> <description>Just for people who get search hits on this page...I suggest the commands:
parted /dev/sda
mklabel gpt
mkpart primary 0 -0
print
quit
mkfs.ext3 /dev/sda1
SassyZ needs to understand that file systems are created within partitions while GPT are applied to disks.  In other words, &quot;parted mklabel gpt /dev/sda&quot; writes a partition table to the first few sectors of a disk drive.  The &quot;mkpart&quot; command creates a partition entry in that GPT.  The first partition is named &quot;/dev/sda1&quot;.  So the mistake in the last command is specifying the wrong device special file name.  The command should be &quot;mkfs.ext3 /dev/sda1&quot; to create a file system in the first partition.  The command &quot;mkfs.ext3&quot; will create a file system starting at sector zero and overwrite the GPT.  (Note I&#039;ve never tried a size of -0, so use print to verify the partition that was created.)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just for people who get search hits on this page&#8230;I suggest the commands:</p><p>parted /dev/sda<br
/> mklabel gpt<br
/> mkpart primary 0 -0<br
/> print<br
/> quit<br
/> mkfs.ext3 /dev/sda1</p><p>SassyZ needs to understand that file systems are created within partitions while GPT are applied to disks.  In other words, &#8220;parted mklabel gpt /dev/sda&#8221; writes a partition table to the first few sectors of a disk drive.  The &#8220;mkpart&#8221; command creates a partition entry in that GPT.  The first partition is named &#8220;/dev/sda1&#8243;.  So the mistake in the last command is specifying the wrong device special file name.  The command should be &#8220;mkfs.ext3 /dev/sda1&#8243; to create a file system in the first partition.  The command &#8220;mkfs.ext3&#8243; will create a file system starting at sector zero and overwrite the GPT.  (Note I&#8217;ve never tried a size of -0, so use print to verify the partition that was created.)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jeff</title><link>http://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/fdisk-unable-to-create-partition-greater-2tb.html#comment-171570</link> <dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 26 May 2011 17:01:32 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/fdisk-unable-to-create-partition-greater-2tb.html#comment-171570</guid> <description>If you get this...
Warning: The resulting partition is not properly aligned for best performance.
You really should run parted like so...
parted -a optimal /dev/sdb</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you get this&#8230;<br
/> Warning: The resulting partition is not properly aligned for best performance.</p><p>You really should run parted like so&#8230;</p><p>parted -a optimal /dev/sdb</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: perrysong</title><link>http://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/fdisk-unable-to-create-partition-greater-2tb.html#comment-171333</link> <dc:creator>perrysong</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 16 May 2011 01:49:35 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/fdisk-unable-to-create-partition-greater-2tb.html#comment-171333</guid> <description>Useful...
Thanks a lot...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Useful&#8230;<br
/> Thanks a lot&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jord Wegge</title><link>http://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/fdisk-unable-to-create-partition-greater-2tb.html#comment-169773</link> <dc:creator>Jord Wegge</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2011 19:38:03 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/fdisk-unable-to-create-partition-greater-2tb.html#comment-169773</guid> <description>quote missing in previous reply:
The backup GPT table is not at the end of the disk, as it should be. This might mean that another operating system believes the disk is smaller. Fix, by moving the backup to the end (and removing the old backup)?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>quote missing in previous reply:</p><p>The backup GPT table is not at the end of the disk, as it should be. This might mean that another operating system believes the disk is smaller. Fix, by moving the backup to the end (and removing the old backup)?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jord Wegge</title><link>http://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/fdisk-unable-to-create-partition-greater-2tb.html#comment-169772</link> <dc:creator>Jord Wegge</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2011 19:36:57 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/fdisk-unable-to-create-partition-greater-2tb.html#comment-169772</guid> <description>Solution for my original problem: ubuntu install cd (in my case 10.10) will only create GPT when the drive is large enough to require it, otherwise it will stick to msdos mbr.
So: make you&#039;re raid as you wish it to be and install straight from cd.
One smaller problem I&#039;m facing now is also GPT-related:
I installed ubuntu on 3x2TB hw raid whilst there still was a 5X2TB soft raid in the same machine. Next I moved the data from the soft raid to the hw raid and expanded the hw raid to its full 8x2TB in raid 6.
When now I want to enlarge /dev/sda3 (ext4) to full raid size I get blocked of by the GPT backup table &lt;&gt;
But I don&#039;t quite see how to do that.
Regards,
Jord</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Solution for my original problem: ubuntu install cd (in my case 10.10) will only create GPT when the drive is large enough to require it, otherwise it will stick to msdos mbr.<br
/> So: make you&#8217;re raid as you wish it to be and install straight from cd.</p><p>One smaller problem I&#8217;m facing now is also GPT-related:<br
/> I installed ubuntu on 3x2TB hw raid whilst there still was a 5X2TB soft raid in the same machine. Next I moved the data from the soft raid to the hw raid and expanded the hw raid to its full 8x2TB in raid 6.<br
/> When now I want to enlarge /dev/sda3 (ext4) to full raid size I get blocked of by the GPT backup table &lt;&gt;</p><p>But I don&#8217;t quite see how to do that.</p><p>Regards,<br
/> Jord</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jord Wegge</title><link>http://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/fdisk-unable-to-create-partition-greater-2tb.html#comment-169226</link> <dc:creator>Jord Wegge</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 26 Feb 2011 16:16:01 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/fdisk-unable-to-create-partition-greater-2tb.html#comment-169226</guid> <description>Great Tut as always.
One question though... All this assumes you&#039;ve got a running system to which you plan to add a second &gt;2TB device. When using GPT, most modern linux distro&#039;s will do as you described.
However, how do you install to such a device?
Situation = 8x2TB raid6 (hardware), and boot-able debian 6.0 cd -&gt; The installer recognizes a 500 GB disk (I previously GPT&#039;ed the device &amp; partitioned it to my liking with gparted livecd).
Suggestions?
TIA,
Jord.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great Tut as always.</p><p>One question though&#8230; All this assumes you&#8217;ve got a running system to which you plan to add a second &gt;2TB device. When using GPT, most modern linux distro&#8217;s will do as you described.</p><p>However, how do you install to such a device?</p><p>Situation = 8x2TB raid6 (hardware), and boot-able debian 6.0 cd -&gt; The installer recognizes a 500 GB disk (I previously GPT&#8217;ed the device &amp; partitioned it to my liking with gparted livecd).</p><p>Suggestions?</p><p>TIA,<br
/> Jord.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Adrian Schmid</title><link>http://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/fdisk-unable-to-create-partition-greater-2tb.html#comment-168983</link> <dc:creator>Adrian Schmid</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 22 Feb 2011 16:36:50 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/fdisk-unable-to-create-partition-greater-2tb.html#comment-168983</guid> <description>I used parted as described to work with large arrays, so I am quite happy with it. One question though. What would be the easiest way to copy partition tables between disks (not partitions!). I know in fdisk there was a tool called sfdisk that let you dump / rewrite partition tables from one disk to another.... is there a similar procedure in parted? any hints greatly appreciated! Adrian</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I used parted as described to work with large arrays, so I am quite happy with it. One question though. What would be the easiest way to copy partition tables between disks (not partitions!). I know in fdisk there was a tool called sfdisk that let you dump / rewrite partition tables from one disk to another&#8230;. is there a similar procedure in parted? any hints greatly appreciated! Adrian</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jay Shepherd</title><link>http://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/fdisk-unable-to-create-partition-greater-2tb.html#comment-163246</link> <dc:creator>Jay Shepherd</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 14 Dec 2010 00:30:48 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/fdisk-unable-to-create-partition-greater-2tb.html#comment-163246</guid> <description>Awesome! Thanks for this, after tweaking fdisk settings for ages i came accross your article. Sorted :D</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome! Thanks for this, after tweaking fdisk settings for ages i came accross your article. Sorted :D</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Dmitry Sherman</title><link>http://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/fdisk-unable-to-create-partition-greater-2tb.html#comment-160703</link> <dc:creator>Dmitry Sherman</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 03 Nov 2010 16:47:02 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/fdisk-unable-to-create-partition-greater-2tb.html#comment-160703</guid> <description>i have an ISCSI 4TB storage, i have partitioned it as needed with GPT label, but suddenly after almost a year of usage when it reached now about 2.5TB i get those messages in the kernel:
kernel: attempt to access beyond end of device
its debian lenny, parted looks good, no errors.
Model: IBM 1726-3xx FAStT (scsi)
Disk /dev/sdb: 3999GB
Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B
Partition Table: gpt
Number  Start   End     Size    File system  Name     Flags
1      17.4kB  3999GB  3999GB  ext3         primary
any suggestions?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i have an ISCSI 4TB storage, i have partitioned it as needed with GPT label, but suddenly after almost a year of usage when it reached now about 2.5TB i get those messages in the kernel:<br
/> kernel: attempt to access beyond end of device<br
/> its debian lenny, parted looks good, no errors.<br
/> Model: IBM 1726-3xx FAStT (scsi)<br
/> Disk /dev/sdb: 3999GB<br
/> Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B<br
/> Partition Table: gpt</p><p>Number  Start   End     Size    File system  Name     Flags<br
/> 1      17.4kB  3999GB  3999GB  ext3         primary</p><p>any suggestions?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
