<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Troubleshooting tip: Lan card (NIC) ordering changed after upgrading to Redhat (RHEL) Linux 4.5</title> <atom:link href="http://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/howto-fix-rhel-centos-nic-ordering-after-upgrade.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/howto-fix-rhel-centos-nic-ordering-after-upgrade.html</link> <description>This is a Linux sys admin journal by Vivek about sys admin work, Linux tips &#38; tricks, hacks, news and more.</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 20:37:43 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: pushpnra kumar</title><link>http://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/howto-fix-rhel-centos-nic-ordering-after-upgrade.html#comment-171271</link> <dc:creator>pushpnra kumar</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2011 12:14:24 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/howto-fix-rhel-centos-nic-ordering-after-upgrade.html#comment-171271</guid> <description>Truble shooting of LAN  card
packet send but not receive packets.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Truble shooting of LAN  card</p><p> packet send but not receive packets.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: vivek</title><link>http://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/howto-fix-rhel-centos-nic-ordering-after-upgrade.html#comment-140222</link> <dc:creator>vivek</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2007 14:29:32 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/howto-fix-rhel-centos-nic-ordering-after-upgrade.html#comment-140222</guid> <description>Pedro,
Yes udev is good choice but Redhat always mix 2.4 and 2.6 kernel (they call it the best of two kernels) and creates a problem.
Appreciate your post!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pedro,</p><p>Yes udev is good choice but Redhat always mix 2.4 and 2.6 kernel (they call it the best of two kernels) and creates a problem.</p><p>Appreciate your post!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Pedro Venda</title><link>http://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/howto-fix-rhel-centos-nic-ordering-after-upgrade.html#comment-140221</link> <dc:creator>Pedro Venda</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2007 14:14:34 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/howto-fix-rhel-centos-nic-ordering-after-upgrade.html#comment-140221</guid> <description>udev can be configured to achieve the same purpose based on MAC addresses as well. it may be a better alternative for non-redhat derived distributions.
cheers,
Pedro Venda.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>udev can be configured to achieve the same purpose based on MAC addresses as well. it may be a better alternative for non-redhat derived distributions.</p><p>cheers,<br
/> Pedro Venda.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
