<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Microsoft listed as most secure os</title> <atom:link href="http://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/most-secure-operating-system.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/most-secure-operating-system.html</link> <description>This is a Linux sys admin journal by Vivek about sys admin work, Linux tips &#38; tricks, hacks, news and more.</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 20:37:43 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: poppyer</title><link>http://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/most-secure-operating-system.html#comment-103214</link> <dc:creator>poppyer</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2007 21:25:15 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/most-secure-operating-system.html#comment-103214</guid> <description>this is a big misunderstanding.
I have just read the report. It only says microsoft is the fastest OS to repair its security holes.
I think the reason is, most of microsoft patches are so critical that they HAVE to patch quick, haha.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this is a big misunderstanding.<br
/> I have just read the report. It only says microsoft is the fastest OS to repair its security holes.</p><p>I think the reason is, most of microsoft patches are so critical that they HAVE to patch quick, haha.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: jens g.r. benthien</title><link>http://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/most-secure-operating-system.html#comment-97939</link> <dc:creator>jens g.r. benthien</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2007 21:54:04 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/most-secure-operating-system.html#comment-97939</guid> <description>This should be nominated for the &#039;joke of the year 2007&#039; ! ! !</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This should be nominated for the &#8216;joke of the year 2007&#8242; ! ! !</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: KaFoX</title><link>http://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/most-secure-operating-system.html#comment-97472</link> <dc:creator>KaFoX</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2007 01:09:53 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/most-secure-operating-system.html#comment-97472</guid> <description>If 2 + 2 = 5, then yes Window$ is the most secure OS on this planet. If 2 + 2 = 4, then yes Window$ is the most insecure OS on this planet.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If 2 + 2 = 5, then yes Window$ is the most secure OS on this planet. If 2 + 2 = 4, then yes Window$ is the most insecure OS on this planet.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Luke</title><link>http://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/most-secure-operating-system.html#comment-97267</link> <dc:creator>Luke</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2007 15:12:25 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/most-secure-operating-system.html#comment-97267</guid> <description>Of course we need to remember that Symantec only makes security products for Windows. It is in their best interest to prevent people from switching to more secure platforms. ;)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course we need to remember that Symantec only makes security products for Windows. It is in their best interest to prevent people from switching to more secure platforms. ;)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
