Read the Fine Print on "Open Source" Software
There is some good discussion going on about open source software licenses and confusion. From the article:
Back in the 1980s, when Richard Stallman was the only one talking about the need for "free software," no one quite knew what he was talking about. That's not just because people looked askance at someone who said it would be possible to write a version of Unix that could be given away for free, along with all of the compilers, editors, and utilities that a typical Unix installation included.
Stallman also managed to confuse people with the term "free" -- he used it as a political statement, saying "free as in freedom," or "free as in 'free speech'," contrasting it with "free as in 'free beer'." But no matter how hard he tried, Stallman was faced with the reality that most people thought of "free software" as programs for which you didn't have to pay money. The fact that Stallman's software was indeed designed to be given away without charge only added to the confusion.
=> Read the Fine Print on "Open Source" Software ( via Linuxtoday )
Want to stay up to date with the latest Linux tips, news and announcements? Subscribe to our free e-mail newsletter or RSS feed to get all updates.
You can Email this page to a friend.
You may also be interested in other helpful articles:
- Open source companies to watch
- Linux: 50 Killer Business Open Source Application to Get your Office on Open Source
- Open source software as a customer capture tool
- Open source gift idea for the holidays
- Open source revenues to touch US $5.8 billon dollars in 2011
Discussion on This Article:
Leave a Reply
We encourage your comments, and suggestions. But please stay on topic, be polite, and avoid spam. Thank you very much for stopping by our site!
Tags: 1980s, confusion, editors, free as in freedom, free beer, free software, free speech, money, open source software, richard stallman, software licenses, typical unix, unix installation



And the point?