<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: How To: Upgrade Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5.3 to v5.4</title> <atom:link href="http://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/red-hat-enterprise-linux-5-4-released.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/red-hat-enterprise-linux-5-4-released.html</link> <description>This is a Linux sys admin journal by Vivek about sys admin work, Linux tips &#38; tricks, hacks, news and more.</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 20:37:43 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: thirisangu</title><link>http://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/red-hat-enterprise-linux-5-4-released.html#comment-164105</link> <dc:creator>thirisangu</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2010 19:17:21 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/?p=5708#comment-164105</guid> <description>i am using dual boot machine for windows 7 and red hat 5. how can i mount my ntfs files via red hat linux</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i am using dual boot machine for windows 7 and red hat 5. how can i mount my ntfs files via red hat linux</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Palani.K</title><link>http://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/red-hat-enterprise-linux-5-4-released.html#comment-156172</link> <dc:creator>Palani.K</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 24 May 2010 05:42:27 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/?p=5708#comment-156172</guid> <description>Hi ,
I need to upgrade the RHEL 5U1 to 5U4 all are production servers . please guide me how to proceed on this .</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi ,<br
/> I need to upgrade the RHEL 5U1 to 5U4 all are production servers . please guide me how to proceed on this .</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: unixfoo</title><link>http://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/red-hat-enterprise-linux-5-4-released.html#comment-152029</link> <dc:creator>unixfoo</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 04:05:27 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/?p=5708#comment-152029</guid> <description>I use the below method for my OS upgrades on RHEL4, RHEL5 and CentOS5. It never breaks..
yum clean all
yum update glibc\*
yum update yum\* rpm\* python\*
yum clean all
yum update
reboot </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use the below method for my OS upgrades on RHEL4, RHEL5 and CentOS5. It never breaks..</p><p>yum clean all<br
/> yum update glibc\*<br
/> yum update yum\* rpm\* python\*<br
/> yum clean all<br
/> yum update<br
/> reboot</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Hari</title><link>http://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/red-hat-enterprise-linux-5-4-released.html#comment-150947</link> <dc:creator>Hari</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 14:20:50 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/?p=5708#comment-150947</guid> <description>can someone point me to tutorials for creating repodata for RHEL.
I have in my environment:
32 and 64 bit.
RHEL 3
RHEL 4
RHEL 5</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>can someone point me to tutorials for creating repodata for RHEL.<br
/> I have in my environment:<br
/> 32 and 64 bit.<br
/> RHEL 3<br
/> RHEL 4<br
/> RHEL 5</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Martin</title><link>http://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/red-hat-enterprise-linux-5-4-released.html#comment-150919</link> <dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 22:36:51 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/?p=5708#comment-150919</guid> <description>I agree  that latency sensitive work loads will probably run on bare metal for the time being. Work is being done in this area.
I also agree that the application load should be tested and only been put in the clouds if it makes sense.
:-)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree  that latency sensitive work loads will probably run on bare metal for the time being. Work is being done in this area.</p><p>I also agree that the application load should be tested and only been put in the clouds if it makes sense.</p><p> :-)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Adam</title><link>http://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/red-hat-enterprise-linux-5-4-released.html#comment-150910</link> <dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 12:59:43 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/?p=5708#comment-150910</guid> <description>Lets not compare mainframes vs x86 hardware. I was talking about heavy video streaming btw. You cant have any latency in network packets and IO because of virtualization. Moving everything to the &quot;cloud&quot; is not the solution for everything.
-Adam</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lets not compare mainframes vs x86 hardware. I was talking about heavy video streaming btw. You cant have any latency in network packets and IO because of virtualization. Moving everything to the &#8220;cloud&#8221; is not the solution for everything.</p><p>-Adam</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Martin</title><link>http://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/red-hat-enterprise-linux-5-4-released.html#comment-150907</link> <dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 10:08:23 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/?p=5708#comment-150907</guid> <description>&quot;For small projects its ok but not for what we do. &quot;... Tell that to the mainframe users that has been running the worlds most high performance mission critical loads on virtual machines for a lot of years.
The hardware and software outside the mainframe world is only starting to catch up. The mainframes has about 30 years head start on this kind of tasks.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;For small projects its ok but not for what we do. &#8220;&#8230; Tell that to the mainframe users that has been running the worlds most high performance mission critical loads on virtual machines for a lot of years.</p><p>The hardware and software outside the mainframe world is only starting to catch up. The mainframes has about 30 years head start on this kind of tasks.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Adam</title><link>http://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/red-hat-enterprise-linux-5-4-released.html#comment-150779</link> <dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 15:00:29 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/?p=5708#comment-150779</guid> <description>RHEL 6 will only support KVM. Migrating from XEN to KVM is as simple as booting in the regular kernel and booting your images from KVM. I run/test Xen,XenServer,KVM and I am going back to run physical servers + load balancers. I jumped on the virtualization bandwagon and its time for back to basics. For small projects its ok but not for what we do.
-Adam</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RHEL 6 will only support KVM. Migrating from XEN to KVM is as simple as booting in the regular kernel and booting your images from KVM. I run/test Xen,XenServer,KVM and I am going back to run physical servers + load balancers. I jumped on the virtualization bandwagon and its time for back to basics. For small projects its ok but not for what we do.</p><p>-Adam</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Vivek Gite</title><link>http://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/red-hat-enterprise-linux-5-4-released.html#comment-150778</link> <dc:creator>Vivek Gite</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 14:45:56 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/?p=5708#comment-150778</guid> <description>Yes, RHEL 5.x has yum and no up2date. RHEL &lt;= v4.x got up2date.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, RHEL 5.x has yum and no up2date. RHEL &lt;= v4.x got up2date.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Santhosh</title><link>http://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/red-hat-enterprise-linux-5-4-released.html#comment-150774</link> <dc:creator>Santhosh</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 10:23:40 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/?p=5708#comment-150774</guid> <description>RHEL have yum ? I have used RHEL long back, at the time, it was up2date and had problem with its licencing, then moved to centos.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RHEL have yum ? I have used RHEL long back, at the time, it was up2date and had problem with its licencing, then moved to centos.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: mod</title><link>http://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/red-hat-enterprise-linux-5-4-released.html#comment-150732</link> <dc:creator>mod</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 03:51:39 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/?p=5708#comment-150732</guid> <description>Did someone already moved from XEN to KVM? I did not find a migration path from XEN (RHEL 5.3) to KVM (5.4) for paravirtualized VMs.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did someone already moved from XEN to KVM? I did not find a migration path from XEN (RHEL 5.3) to KVM (5.4) for paravirtualized VMs.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: vovaNux</title><link>http://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/red-hat-enterprise-linux-5-4-released.html#comment-150696</link> <dc:creator>vovaNux</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 09:41:35 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/?p=5708#comment-150696</guid> <description>Is that possible to perform such an upgrade on a working web server? I mean I don&#039;t have physical access to the server. Are there any things that might go wrong?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is that possible to perform such an upgrade on a working web server? I mean I don&#8217;t have physical access to the server. Are there any things that might go wrong?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: barun</title><link>http://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/red-hat-enterprise-linux-5-4-released.html#comment-150633</link> <dc:creator>barun</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 10:29:30 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/?p=5708#comment-150633</guid> <description>That will be help us to know rhel5.4</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That will be help us to know rhel5.4</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Vivek Gite</title><link>http://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/red-hat-enterprise-linux-5-4-released.html#comment-150622</link> <dc:creator>Vivek Gite</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 09:14:40 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/?p=5708#comment-150622</guid> <description>The upgrade option is the same as the update command with the --obsoletes flag set. Use update option.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The upgrade option is the same as the update command with the &#8211;obsoletes flag set. Use update option.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jack</title><link>http://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/red-hat-enterprise-linux-5-4-released.html#comment-150611</link> <dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 16:29:19 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/?p=5708#comment-150611</guid> <description>Hi Vivek Gite,
I just checked
http://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/upgrading-centos-51-to-52.html
That URL shows a migration of CentOS from version 5.1 to 5.2 --- and while that is not &quot;true Red Hat&quot;, CentOS is Red Hat minus the logos (Red Hat allows the CentOS community to have their distro provided they remove all Red Hat(tm) logos etc).  Sorry if I&#039;m being &#039;master of the obvious&#039; here...
My real question here is - should one (whether they upgrade a Red Hat distro or CentOS distro use
yum update
and then
yum upgrade?
It seems that is what is at that URL - that one does the update then the upgrade.
Just curious
Thanks</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Vivek Gite,</p><p>I just checked<br
/> <a
href="http://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/upgrading-centos-51-to-52.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/upgrading-centos-51-to-52.html</a></p><p>That URL shows a migration of CentOS from version 5.1 to 5.2 &#8212; and while that is not &#8220;true Red Hat&#8221;, CentOS is Red Hat minus the logos (Red Hat allows the CentOS community to have their distro provided they remove all Red Hat(tm) logos etc).  Sorry if I&#8217;m being &#8216;master of the obvious&#8217; here&#8230;</p><p>My real question here is &#8211; should one (whether they upgrade a Red Hat distro or CentOS distro use<br
/> yum update<br
/> and then<br
/> yum upgrade?</p><p>It seems that is what is at that URL &#8211; that one does the update then the upgrade.</p><p>Just curious</p><p>Thanks</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Vivek Gite</title><link>http://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/red-hat-enterprise-linux-5-4-released.html#comment-150610</link> <dc:creator>Vivek Gite</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 16:17:40 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/?p=5708#comment-150610</guid> <description>@Jack,
The last link is for migration  from RHEL to CentOS server.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Jack,</p><p>The last link is for migration  from RHEL to CentOS server.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jack</title><link>http://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/red-hat-enterprise-linux-5-4-released.html#comment-150609</link> <dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 16:13:54 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/?p=5708#comment-150609</guid> <description>Just wondering (see links below) - the info below infers one does the update then the upgrade with yum (again, see links below).
1) do the update with yum
2) Then ==&gt;   yum upgrade
http://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/upgrading-centos-51-to-52.html
or
http://help.godaddy.com/topic/90/article/5558?isc=tech57
While the URL above shows centos, centos is Red Hat without it&#039;s logos.
So (just curious here) - is it perform an update and then upgrade?
Thanks</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just wondering (see links below) &#8211; the info below infers one does the update then the upgrade with yum (again, see links below).<br
/> 1) do the update with yum<br
/> 2) Then ==&gt;   yum upgrade<br
/> <a
href="http://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/upgrading-centos-51-to-52.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/upgrading-centos-51-to-52.html</a><br
/> or<br
/> <a
href="http://help.godaddy.com/topic/90/article/5558?isc=tech57" rel="nofollow">http://help.godaddy.com/topic/90/article/5558?isc=tech57</a><br
/> While the URL above shows centos, centos is Red Hat without it&#8217;s logos.</p><p>So (just curious here) &#8211; is it perform an update and then upgrade?</p><p>Thanks</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Vivek Gite</title><link>http://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/red-hat-enterprise-linux-5-4-released.html#comment-150584</link> <dc:creator>Vivek Gite</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 02:17:33 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/?p=5708#comment-150584</guid> <description>@Yonit,
It&#039;s unknown if Red Hat will continue to support Xen with RHEL6. Xen is the past and KVM is the future as it is part of Linux kernel itself. However, they will NOT drop Xen immediately as tons of XEN servers are powered by RHEL 5.x. Also, Red hat support RHEL 5.x for 7 years.
HTH</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Yonit,</p><p>It&#8217;s unknown if Red Hat will continue to support Xen with RHEL6. Xen is the past and KVM is the future as it is part of Linux kernel itself. However, they will NOT drop Xen immediately as tons of XEN servers are powered by RHEL 5.x. Also, Red hat support RHEL 5.x for 7 years.</p><p>HTH</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jonathan Nguyen</title><link>http://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/red-hat-enterprise-linux-5-4-released.html#comment-150544</link> <dc:creator>Jonathan Nguyen</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2009 13:57:26 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/?p=5708#comment-150544</guid> <description>Thanks, I try to upgrade but not success. I want to install my site in this OS. How to do it? there are my site: &lt;a href=&quot;http://tatca.vn&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;My site &lt;/a&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, I try to upgrade but not success. I want to install my site in this OS. How to do it? there are my site: <a
href="http://tatca.vn" rel="nofollow">My site </a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Yonit</title><link>http://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/red-hat-enterprise-linux-5-4-released.html#comment-150543</link> <dc:creator>Yonit</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2009 11:06:23 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/?p=5708#comment-150543</guid> <description>Does that mean the Redhat is moving from Xen to KVM?
Xen will not be supported in RHEL 6 ?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does that mean the Redhat is moving from Xen to KVM?<br
/> Xen will not be supported in RHEL 6 ?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
