:(){ :|:& };:
The fork bomb is a form of denial-of-service (DoS) attack against a Linux or Unix-based system. It makes use of the fork operation. The :(){ :|:& };: is nothing but a bash function. This function get executed recursively. It is often used by sysadmin to test user process limitations on server. Linux process limits can be configured via /etc/security/limits.conf and PAM to avoid bash fork() bomb. Once a successful fork bomb has been activated in a system it may not be possible to resume normal operation without rebooting the system as the only solution to a fork bomb is to destroy all instances of it.
WARNING! These examples may crash your computer if executed.Understanding :(){ :|:& };: fork() bomb code
:() – Defined the function called :. This function accepts no arguments. The syntax for bash function is as follows:
foo(){ arg1=$1 arg2=$2 echo 'Bar..' #do_something on $arg argument } |
fork() bomb is defined as follows:
:(){ :|:& };:
:|: – Next it will call itself using programming technique called recursion and pipes the output to another call of the function ‘:’. The worst part is function get called two times to bomb your system.
& – Puts the function call in the background so child cannot die at all and start eating system resources.
; – Terminate the function definition.
: – Call (run) the function aka set the fork() bomb.
Here is more human readable code:
bomb() {
bomb | bomb &
}; bombProperly configured Linux / UNIX box should not go down when fork() bomb sets off. See the comment # 5 below for more fork bomb examples created in Perl, Windows XP (batch) and C.
Related: How to: Prevent a fork bomb by limiting user process under Linux.
Preventing fork bomb on Linux
Type the following ulimit command to find out the current maximum processes you can run on Linux:
ulimit -u
OR
ulimit -a
The number 128038 indicates that you can run 128038 processes. To protect your Linux system from a fork bomb, you need to lower that number. To limit your session to 5000 processes, use the following command
ulimit -S -u 5000
WARNING! Please don’t set ulimit numbers too low. This will prevent you from working on your system.Now run fork bomb again:
:(){ :|:& };:
And you will see messages as follows:
bash: fork: Resource temporarily unavailable bash: fork: Resource temporarily unavailable bash: fork: Resource temporarily unavailable bash: fork: Resource temporarily unavailable bash: fork: Resource temporarily unavailable bash: fork: Resource temporarily unavailable bash: fork: Resource temporarily unavailable
You just avoided fork bomb on Linux. Run the following pgrep command to see the current threads limit:
pgrep -wcu $USER
Sample outputs:
5002
- RSS feed or Weekly email newsletter
- Share to Twitter • Facebook • 32 comments... add one ↓
| Category | List of Unix and Linux commands |
|---|---|
| File Management | cat |
| Firewall | CentOS 8 • OpenSUSE • RHEL 8 • Ubuntu 16.04 • Ubuntu 18.04 • Ubuntu 20.04 |
| Network Utilities | dig • host • ip • nmap |
| OpenVPN | CentOS 7 • CentOS 8 • Debian 10 • Debian 8/9 • Ubuntu 18.04 • Ubuntu 20.04 |
| Package Manager | apk • apt |
| Processes Management | bg • chroot • cron • disown • fg • jobs • killall • kill • pidof • pstree • pwdx • time |
| Searching | grep • whereis • which |
| User Information | groups • id • lastcomm • last • lid/libuser-lid • logname • members • users • whoami • who • w |
| WireGuard VPN | CentOS 8 • Debian 10 • Firewall • Ubuntu 20.04 |
i tested this on a fresh install of CentOS and it totaly crashed :P
How about a nice “howto” for protecting against this attacks?
I second the vote for a nice howto.
Cheers
Thirded!
How to prevent a “fork bomb”.
Yes How to must be started, for the benefits of the innocent users, as the viruses are spread by entities whose brains are configured differently.
Perl exmaple:
Python example:
import os while(1): os.fork()Windows XP / Vista bat file example:
UNIX style for Windows:
C program example:
#include int main() { while(1) fork(); }Plz note that the fork bomb is a form of denial of service, so don’t run on production or unauthorized system.
An other one is that when you have set a quota for your mailboxes and crontab is generating mail over and over eventually the quota will exceed, after a while the mailq will fill up with 1000’s of mail and the system will crash.
Hi,
i run it on my testing server and it start consuming my server process.
so one thing is clear from this form bomb that it starting issuing new processes rather than threads.
how we prevent our sites from such fork attacks
Thanks in advance
Yes. And when I don’t tie my shoe laces, I can fall…
And, and, … And, … when I eat too much, I get stomach ache
kunal,
Read https://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/linux-limiting-user-process.html
I tried this on a virtual instance of SLAX, and it totally killed it.
perl inline…
perl -e “fork while fork” &
Sleek code :)
I tried on FC4. Took only 1 minute as root.
In WinXP, I waited till 7 minutes. Displayed some errors and all, but was responding. Tried MS Word, Task Manager, nothing could be executed. The machine was useless untill reset.
This works very quickly on all windows:
:bomb
%0 | %0
goto bomb
This works faster on all windows:
:bomb
start %0
%0|%0
goto bomb
A fork bomb process which can no longer fork exits. The following short Z Shell code will typically get rid of the above fork bomb in about a minute:
while (sleep 100 &!) do; done
It keeps trying and will eventually start a new do-nothing process; Each new do-nothing process reduces the number of rampant “fork bomb” processes by one, until eventually all of them are eradicated, at which point the do-nothing processes can exit.
Use ulimit -u 30 (where 30 it is a max number of process ) to protect yourself from this attack(or config your limits.conf)
That would make a VERY geeky tattoo.
:(){ :|:& };:
This did 100% of nothing on my AuroraUX^ machine.
Load went up for about min to min and a half, then the kernel killed the process for me.
Silly Linux..
On my Ubuntu 10.04 LTS the fork bomb launched about 2500 processes and then my kernel killed it. Total time ~< 5 min.
How would i send a forkbomb/ebomb to an ip without requiring passwords like the ones controled by keys when u stimotaunisusley press keys it opens up stuff on the targets ip.
Debian 5 is immune to this fork bomb.
PCLinuxOS is immune
WARNING! These examples may crash your computer if executed.
may?
They WILL crash your comp.
Win7 – batch WILL kill (also input lag)
try this on for (lack) of size:
Very tiny fork bomb :D
Tried on Mac OS X 10.7.1 from root, bomb was killed in 0.003 s.
:(){ : | : & }; :I did the %0|%0 command in Windows XP. Type into Notepad and saved as FORKBOMB.BAT then double-clicked. Fortunately, I already had task manager running, so I right-clicked explorer and hit “end process tree” which left me with a blank desktop. I then used Alt+Ctrl+Del to reopen Task Manager and from there, typed explorer.exe in the RUN dialog to get Windows back up without rebooting.
If you add an additional command, for example:
PING [insert url of hated website]
you can spam out DOS attacks as well while you watch your computer crash. Seriously people, don’t do that…
It’s almost a right-of-passage to get tricked into running this command when you get your first system. Part of unwinding why your system just crashed actually teaches you quite a bit about unix pipes.
For that reason I’m partly sad that in at least Ubuntu 12.04, the default ulimit setting prevents the bomb from taking down the system.
There is a minimal “cure” for this.
Classic REISUB Linux magic key combo always works for rebooting computer, however, using Alt+SysRq+K will stop all processes on current tty. In the case it doesn’t work, probably you’re on X server and need to use Alt+SysRq+RK.
Ahihi! CoreOS is immune. Though the system was unresponsive for 2 minutes.
Ooops! Totally crashed. fork: Cannot allocate memory. Then Call Trace. Then, not responding to anything, just call trace. Awesome! Is this second to vmsplice?
More power nixCraft!
Why can you create a function named : at all?
:(){ echo colonfunc; }
:
colonfunc
This works for in interactive shell, but not if you put this into a script.
cat < colon.sh
#!/bin/sh:(){ echo colonfunc; }
:
NNNN
chmod +x colon.sh
./colon.sh
./colon.sh: line 2: `:': not a valid identifier
This is what I would expect.
I’ve noticed some but not all versions of bash also allow you to use:
* @ , ? . + – =
and other punctuation characters as shell function names.
% @(){ echo colonfunc; }
bash: syntax error near unexpected token `}’
This behavior I would expect. However, try this on my OSX Macbook:
% @(){ echo colonfunc; }
% @
colonfunc
This is strange, it worked.
What is the difference? Bash versions.
@ works with:
GNU bash, version 3.2.57(1)-release (x86_64-apple-darwin16)
@ does not work with:
GNU bash, version 4.2.25(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Even worse, you can call some functions with punctuation names, but you cannot call them as functions. You can list shell functions with “set | less”. Now search /colonfunc in less for all of the shell functions:
% () { echo colonfunc } , () { echo colonfunc } . () { echo colonfunc } = () { echo colonfunc }% is a function, but you cannot call it.
% %
bash: fg: %: no such job
But this works just fine:
% =
colonfunc
This behavior varies between versions of bash. The fact that shell does allow some punctuation characters as function names seems like a bug. The fact not all versions of bash allows the same set of punctuation characters as function names seems to verify this theory.