If you are running Dell PowerEdge 2950 server or HP ProLiant BL480c G1 server and upgraded from old version to latest Red Hat Enterprise Linux ES release 4.5 (Nahant Update 5) you will notice that ordering of your NIC devices changed.
Fix problem before upgrade:
Before running upgrade via up2date command open /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0 file (for NIC 0) and add line
HWADDR=My-MAC-ADDRESS
Now proceed to upgrade using up2date -u
# up2date -u
Howto fix problem after upgrade:
However chances are very high that after running up2date -u command (i.e. after upgrade) you may notice the problem. Don’t panic. Open grub.conf file:
# vi /etc/grub.conf
Find out current kernel line:
kernel /vmlinuz-2.6.9-55.ELsmp ro root=LABEL=/ console=tty0 console=ttyS1,19200n8
Replace as follows:
kernel /vmlinuz-2.6.9-55.ELsmp ro root=LABEL=/ console=tty0 console=ttyS1,19200n8 pci=nobfsort
The pci=nobfsort option restore the original Kernel 2.6 ordering.
A final note
This problem is not Redhat specific. It can occurred on Suse or any other Linux distribution. Please see Linux enumeration of NICs solution published by Dell for more information.
🐧 Get the latest tutorials on Linux, Open Source & DevOps via:
- RSS feed or Weekly email newsletter
- Share on Twitter • Facebook • 3 comments... add one ↓
| Category | List of Unix and Linux commands |
|---|---|
| File Management | cat |
| Firewall | Alpine Awall • CentOS 8 • OpenSUSE • RHEL 8 • Ubuntu 16.04 • Ubuntu 18.04 • Ubuntu 20.04 |
| Network Utilities | dig • host • ip • nmap |
| OpenVPN | CentOS 7 • CentOS 8 • Debian 10 • Debian 8/9 • Ubuntu 18.04 • Ubuntu 20.04 |
| Package Manager | apk • apt |
| Processes Management | bg • chroot • cron • disown • fg • jobs • killall • kill • pidof • pstree • pwdx • time |
| Searching | grep • whereis • which |
| User Information | groups • id • lastcomm • last • lid/libuser-lid • logname • members • users • whoami • who • w |
| WireGuard VPN | Alpine • CentOS 8 • Debian 10 • Firewall • Ubuntu 20.04 |
Truble shooting of LAN card
packet send but not receive packets.
Pedro,
Yes udev is good choice but Redhat always mix 2.4 and 2.6 kernel (they call it the best of two kernels) and creates a problem.
Appreciate your post!
udev can be configured to achieve the same purpose based on MAC addresses as well. it may be a better alternative for non-redhat derived distributions.
cheers,
Pedro Venda.