Research finds that running 10-50 apps on a mainframe costs less than on one Linux or Solaris server.

I was lucky enough to work on IBM AS/400 system for some time. We used to run AIX, RedHat Debian Linux natively on an iSeries Logical Partition (LPAR).

According to this article:
Fresh light on mainframe total cost of ownership reveals Big Blue’s big iron is cheaper than a roomful of servers.

Research house Illuminata’s report, ‘IBM System z TCO: Man Bites Dog’ shows that running 10-50 applications on a mainframe costs less than running the same workload on a one server/one application basis where the servers run Linux or Solaris.

Reasons for low cost / TCO

=> Mainframe has better cooling technology – A mainframe typically requires less electricity and air conditioning than many 1U servers running the same workload.

=> Cost of people – When running multiple applications the mainframe’s people costs are much less than those needed to run the same workload on distributed systems.

=> Mainframe memory prices have fallen significantly in recent years.

This is an interesting study 🙂

Big Blue cheaper than Red Hat

🐧 Get the latest tutorials on Linux, Open Source & DevOps via RSS feed or Weekly email newsletter.

🐧 3 comments so far... add one
CategoryList of Unix and Linux commands
Disk space analyzersncdu pydf
File Managementcat
FirewallAlpine Awall CentOS 8 OpenSUSE RHEL 8 Ubuntu 16.04 Ubuntu 18.04 Ubuntu 20.04
Network UtilitiesNetHogs dig host ip nmap
OpenVPNCentOS 7 CentOS 8 Debian 10 Debian 8/9 Ubuntu 18.04 Ubuntu 20.04
Package Managerapk apt
Processes Managementbg chroot cron disown fg jobs killall kill pidof pstree pwdx time
Searchinggrep whereis which
User Informationgroups id lastcomm last lid/libuser-lid logname members users whoami who w
WireGuard VPNAlpine CentOS 8 Debian 10 Firewall Ubuntu 20.04
3 comments… add one
  • Adam K Jan 4, 2007 @ 0:01

    Very interesting study indeed. I wonder if there are any mainframe hosting sites out there that are using this as a reason why they are “better”. On another note, if mainframes weren’t so expensive, perhaps I’d buy one instead of a 1U.

  • Doyle W Jan 4, 2007 @ 16:25

    On the basis of this study I have to ask is an IBM mainframe cheaper when one run one application per mainframe? This is the basis of the comparison. How does and IBM compare to a clustered linux application server which runs 10 to 50 apps on 3 to 5 1U servers?

  • 🐧 nixCraft Jan 4, 2007 @ 17:16

    Adam and Doyle,

    Cost is main factor here. No one offers hosting based upon mainfaram. This study is more useful for enterprise computing, IMPO. I think study suggest that you save money using two factores cooling and electricity in a long run.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Use HTML <pre>...</pre> for code samples. Still have questions? Post it on our forum