So Do Illegal codecs (shady definition ) scare you as a Linux user? According to Adrian Kingsley-Hughes:
… Iâ€™m especially interested in rolling out Ubuntu onto older PCs and notebooks where installing Windows will put too much of a strain on the hardware. But thereâ€™s one aspect of Ubuntu, and Linux in general for that matter, thatâ€™s putting me off. This is the fact that to play a DVD or use WMA/WMV files I have to install codecs that are technically illegal to use.
Linux has a number of really strong points that go beyond the price (reliability, ease of use and low hardware requirements to name but a few), but the operating system falls short when it comes to legally supporting file formats such as MP3, WMA/WMV and DVDs. Itâ€™s not that you donâ€™t have support for these formats available, itâ€™s that adding support means entering into some really shady legal territory…
A good question, what do you think? Should patent holder care more about codecs or all downloaded music / mp3 and other formats? One can convert his / her collection to open formats. Luckily in my country there is no such stupid law exists.
Illegal Codecs Put Me Off Linux (via /.)
 In many countries (outside USA) codecs are not illegal.